Sorry for the late reply. On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 2:25 AM Mikolaj Izdebski <mizde...@redhat.com> wrote: > This warning is relevant for upstream projects, but you can safely > ignore it when building RPM packages with XMvn - it always uses > packaged versions of Maven plugins, ignoring versions configured in > POM.
That's good to know. Thank you for the information. > IMHO (1), (3), (2), in that order of preference. > (3) is the most elegant solution, but requires maintaining one more > package than (1), which also works. (2) doesn't make much sense - it > would only silence the warning at the cost of cluttering the spec > file, making it harder to maintain. I have gone with (1) as you suggested. > It's hard to say without looking at the POM structure. I can check if > you give me a reference to the code (upstream, SRPM etc). Fabio figured out that it's because all of the module references are inside profiles. I'm still willing to swap reviews for whoever has time for this. Fabio suggested a slight name change, which I adopted: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898312 (jakarta-json) Thanks, -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
