On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 13:05 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Signed_RPM_Contents > > Note that this change was submitted after the deadline, but since it > can be shipped in an complete state, I am still processing it for > Fedora 34. > > > == Summary == > We want to add signatures to individual files that are part of > shipped RPMs. > These signatures will use the Linux IMA (Integrity Measurement > Architecture) scheme, which means they can be used to enforce runtime > policies to ensure execution of only trusted files. > Is there any relation between this and fapolicyd, that seems to be developed mostly by Red Hat employees?
https://github.com/linux-application-whitelisting/fapolicyd -- Michel Alexandre Salim profile: https://keyoxide.org/mic...@michel-slm.name chat via email: https://delta.chat/ GPG key: 5DCE 2E7E 9C3B 1CFF D335 C1D7 8B22 9D2F 7CCC 04F2
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
