On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 01:48:53PM -0400, Peter Jones wrote: > On 10/04/2010 01:01 PM, Alberto Bertogli wrote: > > Do you have any idea what may be causing this? > > Do you get the same problem if you invoke /usr/bin/ld.bfd instead of just > "ld"?
Yes. $ ld -o libccheck.so -lc -shared && ldd libccheck.so not a dynamic executable $ /usr/bin/ld.bfd -o libccheck.so -lc -shared && ldd libccheck.so not a dynamic executable Both generated files are identical. I also checked and /etc/alternatives/ld points to ld.bfd. > I'm guessing that you're hitting ld.gold by default and it's behaving slightly > differently than the old binutils linker did. Actually, using ld.gold by hand complains about -lc and doesn't even link. Thanks, Alberto -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel