Marek Kasik wrote:
> Thanks for pointing me to this fork, I was not aware of it. I've
> prepared my own pull request already:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/diffpdf/pull-request/1
> 
> Looking at it now, it seems that CI failed for it. I'm going to have a
> look at that.

You probably don't have all the changes required for the Qt 5 port covered.

The Debian package:
https://packages.debian.org/sid/utils/diffpdf
has a patch against the last upstream version to make it support Qt 5.

But in the long run, I think switching to the maintained fork is the way to 
go.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to