* Jakub Jelinek: > A better way to do that is I think what GCC does e.g. with isl, > patch the source so that for the very rarely if ever used feature it doesn't > link against the corresponding library, but instead dlopens it and calls it > through dlsym pointers. > That way, make would not have the guile dependency, and if somebody ever > tries to use the guile stuff, it would dlopen the library, if it isn't > there, it would print some sensible diagnostics like that > dnf install guilewhatever is needed to make it work and fail.
The functionality is sufficiently isolated for this to be possible, but given that there are no users of gmk-expand and gmk-eval, I really do not see the point. Thanks, Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
