On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 09:22:54PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Ben Cotton wrote on 2021/02/11 0:44:
> >In accordance with the new FESCo policy[1] the following
> >provenpackagers will be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a
> >lack of builds submitted in the last six months. If you received this
> >directly, you can reply off-list to indicate you believe you should
> >still have provenpackager status.
> >
> >This is the first time we have done a regular audit of the
> >provenpackagers group, so please be patient with any hiccups in the
> >process. This will be done regularly at the branch point in each
> >release.
> >
> >[1] https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2549
> >
> >Checked 252 provenpackagers
> >The following 117 provenpackagers have not submitted a Koji build
> >since at least 2020-08-05 00:00:00:
> 
> A question from me as a worrier:
> 
> How will become the status of provenpackagers whose sponsor (as
> provenpackager role) is one of the persons listed here to be removed?
> Just the sponsor of such person will be changed to NONE?

I hope it will not change. Though this matters mostly for historical
reasons: I think the old idea of sponsors being forever responsible for
their sponsorees is very far from current practice. Once the sponsorship
happens, the sponsor doesn't matter much anymore.

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to