On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 12:32 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 14:58 -0400, John Poelstra wrote: > > Adam Williamson said the following on 10/06/2010 01:32 PM Pacific Time: > > > On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 12:58 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > > >> Hi, everyone. So we partly used the proposed new nice-to-have bug > > >> tracking system during the F14 Beta process, and it seemed to go well. > > >> In a quick burst of airport productivity, I've quickly written up a > > >> bunch of proposed new wiki pages and modifications to existing ones to > > >> document the nice-to-have process (and, incidentally, extend > > >> documentation of the blocker process, since we don't seem to have much > > >> of it beyond the blocker meeting SOP right now). All the pages can be > > >> found here: > > >> > > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:NTH_adjustment_drafts > > > > > > Thanks to James for his feedback on this. I haven't had much feedback > > > from anyone else. However, given that in practice everyone involved in > > > the release review process has been happy using the NTH system drafted > > > here so far, I intend to make the draft changes final (with > > > modifications to reflect James' feedback) by the end of the week, so if > > > you have any feedback you've been sitting on, now would be the perfect > > > time to send it :) Thanks everyone! > > > > Can you be more specific as to which page we are actually giving > > feedback on? There are five of them there and they almost all look the > > same. > > All of them. They're mostly modifications of existing pages. I'm not > quite sure how you get that they look the same, they're very different.
General note ... There are a few broken links on this page. I didn't inspect *all* of them, but it looks like they will resolve once you've moved the documents into their proposed locations. So probably not a big deal, I can understand the desire to not change the links before and after moving the pages into their final location. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_desktop_results_nth_adjust > is a proposed change to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_results_template . Good stuff. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_desktop_validation_nth_adjust > is a proposed change to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing . Same as above, equally as wholesome :) > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_meeting_nth_draft > is a proposed change to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting . > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process_nth_draft > is a proposed new page; it's not particularly specific to the nice-to-have > proposal, actually, it just became apparent while I was doing this that we > have no page which explains the entire blocker bug review process, and we > should have one. This is it. Funny how when you've been involved in a process for a while, you forget which parts aren't clearly documented/described for others to engage. Nice addition. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/QA:SOP_nth_process_nth_draft is > a proposed new page which covers the whole nice-to-have review process much > as the above proposed page covers the blocker review process. My first reaction looking at the proposed blocker and nth process SOP pages was that they should be combined into a single page, since there is a lot of duplicate document structure/format. But I can't think of any good proposals to offer at the moment that make it better (not worse). It seems you've already been down this route too. Perhaps a reflection on my visual learning habit, I've been playing around with some minor edits of the 2 previous wiki pages that make it a bit easier for me to rapidly locate/grok information without too much reading. Of course, let me know if the edits are too invasive or detract from your intended message. > I included a summary of the whole proposed NTH process in my initial > review request mail. These are the wiki changes necessary to document > that process. Thanks, James
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
