On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 01:07:44AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 02. 03. 21 22:05, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > The devil is in the details: pre-release, snapinfo, minorbump aren't really > > covered by distance being just an integer bumped. > > I don't see this covered in the current method either. Or was it in the > meantime? Anyway:
It is planned and part of the work to be done with this proposal: https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-infra.rpmautospec/autorel.html#using-autorel > - pre-release should go into version (~) > - snapinfo should go into version (~ or ^) > > The only real problem I see here is minorbump. We could have something like: > %{autorel -m}. That means, micobump since this was added here. But I guess > it is ugly. > > > I know we considered the "number of commits since the last version bump" > > when we > > looked into this. I honestly do not remember precisely why we didn't go > > with it. > > IIRC it was because you considered building several rebuilds with different > releases from the same commit a goal (while I'd rather require an empty > commit that explains the reason for the rebuild). Indeed, that approach would not allow rebuilding a commit without adding a new (potentially empty) commit. One of the idea being that not having to add commits would make it easier to do auto-rebuild of dependency chains. Pierre _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
