On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 4:57 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote: > haxe FTBFS because it depends on ocaml-ppx-tools-versioned-devel which > was removed from Rawhide. I'm not clear if ocaml-ppx-tools is a > straight replacement, but I didn't attempt to fix this package, so > please take a look. Also ISTR there was an haxe update upstream.
Oh no! I thought I had tracked down all of the consumers of ocaml-ppx-tools-versioned. So, no, ocaml-ppx-tools is not a straight replacement. Users of ocaml-ppx-tools-versioned are supposed to migrate to ocaml-ppxlib. I'll see what needs to be done to fix this. Sorry about that. > I also recall there was some discussion about whether we need > OCaml 4.12 in Fedora 34. I would prefer _not_ to do this, not only > because it's another couple of days of work, but also because > Fedora 34 is feeding into RHEL 9 and it would pull at least one more > OCaml package in RHEL 9 which I'd like to avoid. But if there was a > real reason why we needed it in F34 then let me know. I have no reason for needing 4.12 in Fedora 34. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
