On Fri, Mar 26, 2021, at 2:06 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:51:56PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 26. 03. 21 18:24, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > > >python2.7 churchyard cstratak torsava vstinner > > > > I was curious. The error is: > > > > 0001: file '/usr/lib64/python2.7/lib-dynload/pyexpat.so' contains a > > standard > > rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] > > > > And the cause is... our own patch 😱 > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python2.7/blob/rawhide/f/00187-add-RPATH-to-pyexpat.patch > > > > For reasons I don't understand, the bugzilla referenced from the > > patch is private. It is a RHEL 6.2 bugzilla from 2012 that could be > > summarized as: > > > > "If the user sets $LD_LIBRARY_PATH to a directory with > > broken/incompatible libraries, Python breaks." > > I'd vote for treating this as the wrong solution in the wrong place. > If you set LD_LIBRARY_PATH, you get to keep both pieces if anything goes > wrong. >
Agreed. /me glares at SCL for LD_LIBRARY_PATH brokenness V/r, James Cassell _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
