On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 5:18 PM Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> wrote:
> * Charalampos Stratakis: > > > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 5:08 PM Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > * Charalampos Stratakis: > > > > > I think these rules make sense for RUNPATH, and we should outright > ban > > > RPATH. > > > > > > I'd agree here as well, however this could be a future fedora change > > > as I would deem it too disruptive to outright ban RPATH for now. > > > > I don't agree because of this: > > > > > I think we also should binutils with --enable-new-tags at configure > > > time. > > > > We wouldn't have RPATH after that anymore. > > > > So to understand it better, do you mean globally enabling the > > --enable-new-dtags? > > Correct, we have infrastructure for that already. > > That is an interesting proposition. --enable-new-dtags would in essence move the RPATH entries to DT_RUNPATH instead of DT_RPATH and then a new BRP policy script could be written applying the aforementioned rules for RUNPATH. Could be simpler, but I'll have to approach this from a different POV. I'll ponder on it for a bit. So to summarize, you're proposing: Banning RPATH through using --enable-new-dtags (with hopefully no intervention required from packagers). Apply the check-rpath rules (excluding the $ORIGIN one) for RUNPATH instead. > Thanks, > Florian > > -- Regards, Charalampos Stratakis Senior Software Engineer Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
