On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 1:01 PM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 14. 05. 21 16:29, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > * Fedora wants to use the latest version of an upstream, but ELN wants
> > to stay on LTS releases (e.g. Firefox)
>
> About this use case:
>
> Is ELN still consumed as an "add-on repo" for Rawhide, or that is no
> longer true? Becasue if it is still the case, this might not work properly.
>

That's a really good question that I don't have a solid answer to at
the moment. I'm not sure it would *ultimately* be a major issue, as
it's less likely for ELN to have *newer* packages than Rawhide does
(and if they're older, DNF will basically ignore them unless
specifically requested).

I'd like us to get to a point where ELN is consistently installable,
even if that's not an "official" goal.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to