On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 06:26 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> writes:
> 
> > [...]
> > But some other channels that are not Fedora channels, but which a lot
> > of Fedora people are interested in, decided to move, or at least to
> > tell people that they also had a channel on the new network. Then
> > Freenode peremptorily took over those channels for posting links to the
> > new channel.
> 
> In the cases where the projects announced their outright move to a new
> server, it stands to reason that keeping an "official" (#name) channel
> is no longer appropriate at the old network.  The response of cleaning
> up after a no-longer-official channel cannot logically be used to
> justify moving the channel in the first place - this is the circular
> reasoning I was referring to.

The response to channel B moving or just referring to a new channel for
B on a different server, however, can inform channel A's decision to
move. Which is what I said.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to