Hi,
On 6/1/21 6:20 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> doxbox-staging is trying to overwrite the regular dosbox package:
>
> Installing:
> dosbox-staging x86_64 0.76.0-2.fc34 fedora
> 1.4 M
> replacing dosbox.x86_64 0.74.3-7.fc34
>
> From its SPEC[1]:
>
> # This package is a drop-in replacement for dosbox
> Provides: dosbox = %{version}-%{release}
> Obsoletes: dosbox < 0.74.4
>
> Is this Okay? These packages has different maintainers. According to the
> Fedora packaging guidelines, one package cannot introduce conflicts with
> another.
This is intentional, regular dosbox is more-or-less (*) unmaintained upstream
so we have decided to switch to dosbox-staging, also see the Package Review for
dosbox staging:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884608
As such dosbox-staging is intended as a replacement for the regular dosbox (and
it is fully compatible with the regular dosbox). This was coordinated with the
dosbox owner, but we have forgotten to actually retire dosbox, sorry about
that. I'll retire dosbox in rawhide right away.
Regards,
Hans
*) They have not done a release in many years, nor has any meaningful feature
development are maintenance like moving to SDL2 happened.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
