Am 12.06.21 um 02:51 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
Also, not having it available has made it *very* hard to prioritize
getting the issues fixed in DNF. So being able to improve this is
predicated on the existence of signed metadata.
This seems odd to me. I mean, it can't be hard to setup a test repo, is
it? I suspect we could even ask QE folks to do some testing and map out
the issues they find. I don't think it's nice/ethical to break users
just as a means to make bugs we want to have fixed higher priority.
Anyhow, we are pretty off topic for this thread, so I'll try and stop...
kevin
Does it really hurt someone, if the repos get signed and clients just do
not check this by default?
Of course, the signing should not break the unchecked repo in any form,
which needs a small testcase ;)
Best regards,
Marius
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
