On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 7:27 PM Rémi Lauzier via devel
<devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> So it seem that the date format for changelog in .spec file are somewhat 
> different between package. Rust2rpm produce a format, the same that automatic 
> scratch build produce. But there are developer that use another format in 
> there package.
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-owned_ttf_parser/pull-request/1
>
> Maybe fedora should have a standard to follow to have less confusion between 
> packager and reduce the burden to know the preference of the packager of each 
> package.
>
> i have no preference over one another, be it without precise time or with it 
> down to the seconds. I think fedora should have a standard to follow.

Well, *technically*, the "old" format without the time and timezone is
the only one that's really supported everywhere, so I guess that's the
standard.
rpmdev-bumpspec changed to use the format with time+timezone for a
while, but was met with harsh opposition, so the change was reverted.
All tools in Fedora - except rust2rpm - use the format without
time+timezone. I just didn't have time to patch rust2rpm to use that
format again too.

Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
  • Date format Rémi Lauzier via devel
    • Re: Date format Fabio Valentini

Reply via email to