On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 4:32 PM Simo Sorce <s...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hello, > I just rebased libkcapi in Rawhide, without realizing there was an ABI > change. > The ABI change should affect only S390 but I am discussing with the > author on handling this better given the library does use symbol > versioning.
It is already being discussed here: https://github.com/smuellerDD/libkcapi/issues/115 Please in the future at least look at open pull requests before you push something to dist-git. I had started the rebase to 1.3 already [1], but was holding it off because of the ABI change (though to be fair I didn't note that in the PR). > > So I may "revert" this ABI change in short order. > > Apologies if any build will have issues between today and when I will > be able to handle it, if you have any concerns please let me know. AFAIK, no other package in Fedora currently links against libkcapi, so there should be no impact on other packages. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libkcapi/pull-request/24 -- Ondrej Mosnacek Software Engineer, Linux Security - SELinux kernel Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
