On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 09:35:37AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 9:30 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > On 21/07/2021 17:15, Jerry James wrote: > > > In fact, the ones I've looked at are empty commits. There is a commit > > > message, but no changes of any kind to the spec file: no release bump, > > > no changelog entry. > > > > Yes, I can confirm[1]: > > > > Authored and Committed by releng 3 hours ago > > 0 file changed. 0 lines added. 0 lines removed. > > > > [1]: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/aircrack-ng/c/b9c84c950c4a300709ac6dfee5d0a3b83c42447e?branch=rawhide > > That would be the right thing to do for packages using rpmautospec. > My suspicion is that rpmautospec support was added to the rebuild > script, but it is somehow detecting packages that do not actually use > rpmautospec.
I guess normally such builds would immediately fail because koji does not allow non-scratch builds with the same nevra. But in case of the mass rebuild, it works for packages which haven't been build for F35 yet [1]: aircrack-ng-1.6-8.fc34 != aircrack-ng-1.6-8.fc35. But it'll break for packages which have been already built for F35. It's also very confusing even if it works. [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1782783 Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
