Le mar. 31 août 2021 à 19:22, Justin Forbes <jmfor...@linuxtx.org> a écrit : > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 12:14 PM Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> wrote: .. > While it might take a good bit of time to sit down and figure out > exactly what is *useful* from a multilib standpoint, I don't think > that is necessary at this time. It really could be simplified to "do I > build a library or not?". if the package ships a library, keep > building it for i686, if not, you can disable it. It isn't an optimal > solution, but it would probably cut down considerably on build time, > and resource usage.
Unfortunately, some binaries (i686) are sometimes needed when building a library, especially as we don't "cross-compile", so the first binary needed will be gcc (which also has few libraries). Because of that, drawing the line between what is needed for multilibs and what's not is a moving target. As some dependencies might "change" for a given library. We are currently experiencing that in "3rd part" as we are only building a limited set of packages for i686. (because the way i686 repository is only provided in koji vs normal repositories). Maintaining an i686 buildroot synchronized from koji adds some dependencies for the same set of i686 packages to build. - Nicolas _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
