On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 10:45 AM Dan Čermák <dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com> wrote: > > Hi Florian, > > Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> writes: > > > * Dan Čermák: > > > >> it has been recently proposed to switch openSUSE to run ldconfig via a > >> %transfiletriggerin/-un scriptlet instead of manually in %post & %postun > >> the same way as Fedora does it at the moment. > >> > >> However, an interesting issue has been raised: what happens if package A > >> gets upgraded in the same transaction as package B, but B needs A during > >> the upgrade. A will install a new shared library, but ldconfig will run > >> after B has already tried to upgrade. > > > > Fedora ships the soname links in the package, addressing this issue. > > For example, openssl-libs contains: > > > > /usr/lib64/libcrypto.so.1.1 > > /usr/lib64/libcrypto.so.1.1.1k > > /usr/lib64/libssl.so.1.1 > > /usr/lib64/libssl.so.1.1.1k > > > > As a result, running ldconfig is purely an optimization. > > Would that still be the case when the SONAME is bumped? I would assume > that the old symlink is no longer valid. Or is that also not an issue > because we rebuild the dependency on a SONAME bump? >
Since this happens at package build time via a buildroot policy script[1], this is seamlessly handled. If we want to add this to rpm-config-SUSE, I could add it... [1]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/blob/rawhide/f/brp-ldconfig -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
