On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:19 PM Peter Boy <p...@uni-bremen.de> wrote: > > > > > Am 27.09.2021 um 11:13 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr>: > > > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 10:57:12AM +0200, Peter Boy wrote: > >> > > > >> What do you want to gain from it? What is the goal to be? > > > > I believe the original email from Fabio answers both of these questions. > > I donβt find a plan or a goal. Please, provide me with a hint.
All I wanted to say is that the current state is disingenuous at best, and misleading at first. By having @java-maint-sig as one of the admins of a package (and for most of them, also the default bugzilla assignee), while that group doesn't really function any longer, a false expectation of "there's a whole group of people maintaining this package", while the reality is closer to "zero or maybe one person might be looking at this package once a year". I'd rather have the group start from zero now, and start *adding* packages again that are actually really needed, wanted, and maintained. This should also be a less daunting prospect for potential packagers who are now just lurking on the sidelines, because they can't commit to helping maintain 100+ packages (I actually know that there's a few of those - thank you for contacting me off-list. you know who you are :) ) Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
