On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:54:47PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Daniel P. Berrangé wrote on 2021/11/02 21:33: > > On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:22:06PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > > > Daniel P. Berrangé wrote on 2021/11/02 20:50: > > > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 05:35:45PM -0400, Michael Jeanson wrote: > > > > > I have started the process of updating lttng-ust to 2.13 in rawhide > > > > > which > > > > > implies a soname bump of liblttng-ust to 1 and liblttng-ust-ctl to 5. > > > > > > > > > > From what I understand, the following packages will need to be > > > > > rebuilt: > > > > > > > > > > libcamera > > > > > mir-server-libs > > > > > > > > > > These packages might also be impacted: > > > > > > > > > > ceph-base > > > > > dotnet-runtime > > > > > librados2 > > > > > librbd1 > > > > > librgw2 > > > > > lttng-tools > > > > > mir-test-tools > > > > > > > > > > I have created a side tag 'f36-build-side-47029' and built lttng-ust > > > > > and > > > > > lttng-tools. I plan to have the side-tag merged in rawhide in about a > > > > > week. > > > > > > > > What's the status of the dependant builds for the side tag ? > > > > > > > > I've just tried to build libvirt in rawhide and it fails to install > > > > the build root because librbd is still linking against the old soname > > > > for liblttng-ust > > > > > > > > > > > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8499/78208499/root.log > > > > > > > > Error: > > > > Problem 1: package librbd-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires > > > > librbd.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > > > - package librbd-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires > > > > librbd_tp.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > > > - package librbd-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires librbd1 = > > > > 2:16.2.6-2.fc36, but none of the providers can be installed > > > > - conflicting requests > > > > - nothing provides liblttng-ust.so.0()(64bit) needed by > > > > librbd1-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 > > > > Problem 2: package librados-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires > > > > librados.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > > > - package librados-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires > > > > librados_tp.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > > > - package librados-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires > > > > librados2 = 2:16.2.6-2.fc36, but none of the providers can be installed > > > > - conflicting requests > > > > - nothing provides liblttng-ust.so.0()(64bit) needed by > > > > librados2-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Daniel > > > > > > > > > > Looks like only lttng-ust and lttng-tools are built on the side tag and > > > they are merged: > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-758d58d74f > > > > > > So perhaps the dependant packages needs rebuilding... > > > > Sigh. > > > > I long for a day when rawhide gating CI blocks RPM updates that > > break soname until all affected packages are re-built... > > > > soname bump breakage is what makes rawhide so unpleasant use or > > work with. > > > > Regards, > > Daniel > > > > $ dnf repoquery --qf > '%{name}-%{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}\t%{sourcerpm}' --whatrequires > "liblttng-ust.so.0()(64bit)" > ceph-base-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 ceph-16.2.6-2.fc36.src.rpm > dotnet-runtime-3.1-0:3.1.17-2.fc35.x86_64 dotnet3.1-3.1.117-2.fc35.src.rpm > dotnet-runtime-5.0-0:5.0.8-1.fc35.x86_64 dotnet5.0-5.0.205-1.fc35.src.rpm > libcamera-0:0.0.0~git.20210928.e00149f-1.fc36.x86_64 > libcamera-0.0.0~git.20210928.e00149f-1.fc36.src.rpm > librados2-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 ceph-16.2.6-2.fc36.src.rpm > librbd1-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 ceph-16.2.6-2.fc36.src.rpm > librgw2-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 ceph-16.2.6-2.fc36.src.rpm > mir-server-libs-0:2.4.0-3.fc35.x86_64 mir-2.4.0-3.fc35.src.rpm > mir-test-tools-0:2.4.0-3.fc35.x86_64 mir-2.4.0-3.fc35.src.rpm > > ceph - currently rebuilding > dotnet3.1 - rebuild fails, looks like bootstrapping is needed > dotnet5.0 - rebuild fails, looks like bootstrapping is needed > libramera - currently rebuilding > mir - rebuild failed - looks like wlcs needs rebuild against new gtest first
Great, thanks for kicking off the rebuilds for ceph. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
