On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 04:37 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Martin Stransky wrote: > > there's a new Firefox update waiting in Bodhi and we can't push it to > > stable because of new rules. We recommend you to update to it ASAP as it > > fixes a public critical 0day vulnerability > > (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607222). > > Looks like the F13 build got karma quickly enough to land directly in stable > after all, the F12 build, on the other hand, was stuck in testing for 2 days > before finally making it out to stable. Yet another blatant example of > failure of the Update Acceptance Criteria, needlessly exposing our users to > critical vulnerabilities.
Kevin, could you *please* not word things like that? There's just no need for it. I already wrote this to -test a couple of days ago: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-October/095135.html and we're discussing it there. I think the thread demonstrates things tend to go much more constructively if you avoid throwing words like 'blatant' and 'failure' and 'needlessly' around. We designed a policy, put it into effect, now we're observing how well it works and we can modify its implementation on the fly. It doesn't need to be done in an adversarial spirit. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
