Dne 02. 01. 22 v 17:19 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
Testing rpm-specs/ipxe.spec
No terminal defined for 'w' at line 1 col 8
GPLv2 with additional permissions and BSD
^
Expecting: {'AND', 'OR'}
The license does appear to be accurate in the sense that it reflects
the somewhat unusual license of iPXE.
The problem is that
GPLv2 with additional permissions
is not valid short name from
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Software_License_List
The License tag was never formally defined. If we agree that there can be
anything, then let it be.
Just most of our strings are in the form:
license: "(" license ")" | license operator license | short_name
operator: "and" | "or"
where short_name is the identifier from Licensing:main.
If we fix few exceptions like "license, license" then we will benefit from
* unified syntax
* machine readable string
* automatic validation
I recommend to track such exceptions in comments. E.g.
# the actual license have additional permission allowing to ....
License: GPLv2 and BSD
Miroslav
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure