Well, turns out https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors isn't allowing PRs.
I've pushed to a branch here with updates and dead-link-fixes for the README: https://pagure.io/fork/mcinglis/packager-sponsors/tree/pr-readme-update @Kevin Fenzi , you're welcome to pull that (or use it) into the repo if you think it looks good. Aside link fixes, it conditionalizes the blurb about "don't apply for sponsorship unless you have packages that have gone through package review process", which I think is what deterred me here. Cheers, Malcolm On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 21:30:02 +0000, Malcolm Inglis <miing...@amazon.com> wrote: > Thanks, Fabio! > > I'm sorry I missed the process to cut a ticket in packager-sponsors. > I've done that now: https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/511 > > That doc page was one of the few I was bouncing around until I opted > to email this list. That page linked to the repo's README, which then > linked "Procedure for new packagers" to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers > , which linked back to the original doc page. That page had a section > on "How to find a sponsor", which seemed to imply I'd need to find a > sponsor to volunteer *before* moving ahead. Meanwhile, I noticed that > several 'Self Introduction' emails on this list had sought and > received sponsorship, so I figured this was a way that would work. > > It may help if said doc page elaborated the process, perhaps by > describing an example request, and if the README on > `packager-sponsors` was also elaborated and updated to not link to > dead wikis. I can try to send some PRs to help out there. > > I understood why `packager` membership is required for various > infrastructure access; it makes perfect sense to avoid managing > effectively-free-world-writable storage :) I don't believe I raised > any contention there. The PR that Maxwell linked seems very appealing, > though. It would be great if PRs with new sources from > non-packager-members could pass CI without any action from > maintainers. > > The problem that Maxwell raised about sources updates is not one that > I've experienced. I've had a PR with new sources be accepted as-is > just fine ( > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-prompt-toolkit/pull-request/1 > ). It's just that the CI run was failing (as per state of my other > outstanding PRs) until the maintainer stepped in. > > Cheers, Malcolm > > P.S. my apologies for letting my corporate mailserver rules mess up > the thread subject by adding '[EXTERNAL]'. I'll try to catch that in > future. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
