Hi Adam, thanks for asking this question!
Due to similar horrible bugs before, I have uninstalled sudo and friends, but I never managed to uninstall pkexec due to those dependencies. > The issue and some of the comments around it prompted me to wonder - > why is `pkexec` still a thing? Particularly, why is it still a thing we > are shipping by default in just about every Fedora install? Probably because gnome-initial-setup requires it [1]? > Does anything in Workstation use > pkexec? On my system [2], apart from gnome-initial-setup, only Grsync references pkexec in its source code [3]. > Should we just split it out of the polkit package into a subpackage and > stop shipping the subpackage on those editions/spins at least? +1 on that pragmatic solution! [1] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-initial-setup/-/blob/master/gnome-initial-setup/gis-pkexec.c [2] I used `rpmreaper polkit` and walked through the source code of all the 14 direct dependencies of polkit and searched them for `pkexec`. GNOME shell mentions it a lot in source code but I cannot find it being called. [3] https://sourceforge.net/p/grsync/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/grsync/src/callbacks.c _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
