Orion Poplawski <or...@nwra.com> writes:

> On 1/29/22 19:40, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:

>> Looks like "minusone" variable looking like constant value defined
>> in
>> fortran/test/tH5A_1_8.F90 needs PARAMETER attribute. Tried this diff:
>> ```
>> diff --git a/hdf5.spec b/hdf5.spec
>> index 3b1d27b..2bac44d 100644
>> --- a/hdf5.spec
>> +++ b/hdf5.spec
>> @@ -187,6 +187,8 @@ autoreconf -f -i
>>   # Modify low optimization level for gnu compilers
>>   sed -e 's|-O -finline-functions|-O3 -finline-functions|g' -i
>> config/gnu-flags
>> +sed -i fortran/test/tH5A_1_8.F90 -e 's|INTEGER :: minusone|INTEGER, 
>> PARAMETER :: minusone|'
>> +
>>   %build
>>   #Do out of tree builds
>>   %global _configure ../configure
>> ```
>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=82124997
>> Unfortunately ppc64le %check fails, looking like long double
>> related,
>> which I believe is related to recent gcc default change to
>> -mabi=ieeelongdouble on ppc64le,
>> however I don't know how to fix this.
>
> Thank you!  I've passed that on to upstream.

I'm no longer a language lawyer, but it looks to me as if it should be
reported as a GCC bug.  Is there something in the standard which says
the code is invalid?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to