On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 05:20:02PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Should gpg 1.x be installed as /usr/bin/gpg1, gpg 2.x be installed as > /usr/bin/gpg2 (as is already the case), and /usr/bin/gpg replaced > with a symlink managed by alternatives? > If you check the list archives, this has come up before and the answer was no. gpg1 and gpg2 are intended to provide separate functionality.
-Toshio
pgpSH8pWWhIkK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
