On Tue, 2022-02-15 at 15:46 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 15. 02. 22 15:31, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Tue, 2022-02-15 at 10:33 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 14. 02. 22 10:34, Michal Schorm wrote:
> > > > The time had to come, when two packages would generate the same
> > > > hash.
> > > > 
> > > > I was hit by:
> > > > ---
> > > > Error: Transaction test error:
> > > >     file/usr/lib/.build-
> > > > id/34/feaa549462e8818baa0629ce11da344465882b
> > > > conflicts between attempted installs of discord-0.0.16-
> > > > 1.fc35.x86_64
> > > > and skypeforlinux-8.79.0.95-1.x86_64
> > > > ---
> > > > some time ago but since neither is a package maintained by
> > > > Fedora
> > > > Project maintainers, no one gave a damn about the core of the
> > > > issue.
> > > > That time, I got one of the apps as a Flatpak instead, but not
> > > > all
> > > > packages have such workarounds at hand.
> > > 
> > > That's because they both ship the same electron binary.
> > 
> > Right , so ? two package can't ship the same binary on Fedora ?
> 
> I never said that. What I meant is that that problem is known and I
> need to 
> help with a different problem.

I was being ironic, I didn't want to say that either, sorry. 

But I think the root of the problem is the same,  .build-id hash be the
same is not a coincidence .

Also we have old bug reports about .build-id hash conflicts , IIRC .


Best regards,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to