On Wed, 2022-02-16 at 10:35 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Definitely.  I have long said that any time there's a scriptlet in an
> RPM package, we should work towards removing it.
> 
> BTW I found this F31 change proposal.  Did it happen?  The bug was
> CLOSED/CURRENTRELEASE.
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/LimitScriptletUsage
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754666
> 

 Didn't have enough resources, so got dropped. Some upstream code/data
is here:

https://github.com/james-antill/scriptlets-monitor
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JamesAntill/ScriptletUsage
https://github.com/james-antill/combined

...and a couple of things went into the distro.
 IIRC the rough thoughts/conclusions, at the time, was that the big win
was when you could get a complete install done without any scriptlets
and it should be possible to get a bunch of the small cases to that win
state (@minimal, base image). 
 Maybe get @server a release or two later.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to