On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 23:14 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > 2. I screwed up and introduced a packaging bug, for instance bad > dependencies or inability to "yum update". That's been known to happen > too. But I have a lot more faith in autoqa being able to catch that > kind of problem in a timely fashion than I do in manual testing catching > it.
In the long run so do we, but right now, autoqa is not hooked up to the build process in any way. It's manual testing or nothing. > I guess what this boils down to is that I'd be happier with the testing > process if it were actually successful at finding problems. In my > experience, it's a week's delay for exactly zero return. It does find problems. Though, by what you say, not in your packages, so I know where you're coming from; but we've certainly caught a positive integer amount of bugs with the process. :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
