On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 02:05 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 13:54 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > So I went to do a dnf system-upgrade from F35 to F36 on a test
> > machine,
> > as part of my usual testing.  In the middle of the process, it
> > appears
> > that /var filled up and that left the system in an unfortunate
> > state.
> > Surprisingly (to me) it did boot with a random mix of F35 and F36
> > packages and even though it's a throwaway test box, I wanted to
> > play
> > around with fixing it a bit and trying to understand why it ran out
> > of
> > space instead of just reinstalling.
> > 
> > Turns out that "dnf --releasever 36 --nogpgcheck remove --
> > duplicates"
> > was able to effectively everything in the system, and while running
> > this
> > /var filled up again.  When that happened, dnf couldn't even be
> > aborted;
> > I had to kill -9.  The culprit is the write-ahead log,
> > /var/lib/rpm/rpmdb.sqlite-wal.  I resized /var and reran, and by
> > the
> > end
> > of the process had grown to over 9GB:
> > 
> > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 9124576392 May 13 13:11 rpmdb.sqlite-wal
> > 
> > Of course it immediately went to 0 once the transaction completed,
> > though rpmdb.sqlite went from:
> > 
> > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 281739264 May 11 14:24 rpmdb.sqlite
> > 
> > to
> > 
> > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 730648576 May 13 13:15 rpmdb.sqlite
> > 
> > which seems... odd for what's effectively just reinstalling the
> > existing
> > package set.
> > 
> 
> ll /var/lib/rpm/rpmdb* -h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 666M May 15 21:12 /var/lib/rpm/rpmdb.sqlite
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  32K May 16 01:52 /var/lib/rpm/rpmdb.sqlite-
> shm
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root    0 May 15 21:12 /var/lib/rpm/rpmdb.sqlite-
> wal
> 
> so 9 Gigas is not normal 
> 
> but you can do a symbol link to other partition of
> /var/lib/dnf/system-
> upgrade/ , is required the symbol link be relative , at least this
> worked some years ago .
> I decide *not* separate root partition of home partition, now they
> are
> only one partition, exactly to avoid this kind of problem. Also /var
> where are docker files , databases , mock cache and build dirs , etc
> etc make root partition fill up often .
> 


https://access.redhat.com/discussions/641923 


> 
> 
> > Anyway, obviously the solution is to make sure that /var is "big
> > enough"
> > before you do a system upgrade.  And we do have warnings about
> > filesystems being too small, but nothing about needing an extra
> > 10GB
> > for
> > this.  Certainly my case might be somewhat pathological and it was
> > good
> > that in the end I was able to get the system back into a useful
> > state
> > without wiping it.  But in the end I wonder:
> > 
> > 1) Is it really expected that the wal file will grow to that size?
> > 
> > 2) Is there anything to be done to reduce the size of the log?
> > 
> > 3) Is there any better way to handle a lack of space in /var during
> > an
> > RPM transaction?
> > 
> > 4) Can we estimate how large the file will grow, and refuse to
> > start
> > a
> > system upgrade if there is not enough space?  Certainly we already
> > do
> > this to some degree, but it seems that the estimate of the required
> > space is a bit too small.
> > 
> >  - J<
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
> 
> -- 
> Sérgio M. B.
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to