On 5/18/22 18:01, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 11:55 AM jiri vanek <jva...@redhat.com> wrote:
You can imagine TCK as gigantic and pretty good testsuite, runing 24hours with
quite complicated setup. The pull and setup and run is completely autoamted,
but it is a lot of HW you need (all architecures x all oses x all jdks). In
adition, you need human power to keep with TCK evolution, sometimes to dapt
setup, and to check resutls if they fails... and.. to fix it. We have HW from
Red hat, and we deal with failures we keep track with usptream and TCK
evolution. But it is not easy from human resources point of view.
At this point, I'd rather have an OpenJDK in Fedora than not. If that
means switching to bundled libraries, then fine. But all bundled
libraries need to be documented in the spec file and that information
needs to be kept up to date.
I deeply appreciate your understanding.
Can we do this without going down the route of building only once at
one distribution tag and tagging the binary into everything else?
If we do only this dirst part, then the TCK burden would not be lifted.
Still it make maintaneace much more easy.
--
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA Software Engineer
Red Hat Inc.
+420 775 39 01 09
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
