On Thu, 26 May 2022 at 11:32, Kevin P. Fleming <kpflem...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 5/26/22 11:06, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > 2. Are there ways that a non-TCK compliant version could be distributed? > > I would suggest phrasing that slightly differently: the version being > distributed could very well be fully compliant (would pass the TCK if > tested), but may not have been tested. > > Yes, that goes into the my misunderstanding of what TCK is. Some systems can only say they are 'compliant' if they are 'certified' and anything else is 'fraudulent'. Others allow for 'complaint' and 'certified' to be different. In either case, I should have clarified with 'certified'. > -- > Kevin P. Fleming > He/Him/His > Principal Program Manager, RHEL > Red Hat US/Eastern Time Zone > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
