On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 at 19:31, Gordon Messmer <gordon.mess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Alma is release 8 and CentOS Stream is release 9. I am not surprised > that there are some benchmarks where they differ. I would, however, be > fairly surprised if benchmarks showed significant differences between > RHEL, Alma, and CentOS Stream 8, or RHEL, Alma, and CentOS Stream 9. > > > > I'd like to see benchmarks before accepting this as a fact. > > Aren't we looking at them? :) > > I am expecting the words are: I would like to see benchmarks we can agree are useful being done by a 'trusted' third party versus a site (or at least does Apples to Apples comparisons of Alma 9 vs CS9 vs Fedora 34 and Alma8 vs CS8 vs Fedora 29 etc ). Clear Linux also seems to carry various out of band patches to the kernel, systemd and other places to speed things up so I expect it is more than just throwing the CPU into performance mode. -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
