On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 6:52 AM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Not quite the right incantation, because it leaves out anything that does not
> BuildRequire explicitly the string openssl1.1-devel but rather some of its
> virtual provides. Here you go:
>
> $ repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires openssl1.1-devel |
> grep src$
[snip]
> bigloo-0:4.4c-4.4.fc37.src
I was surprised to see this one on the list. (I maintain this
package.) The spec file includes:
BuildRequires: pkgconfig(openssl)
and:
$ dnf --repo=rawhide repoquery --requires bigloo-libs
[snip]
libssl.so.3()(64bit)
libssl.so.3(OPENSSL_3.0.0)(64bit)
The package really is built with openssl 3. Also:
$dnf --repo=rawhide repoquery --provides openssl1.1-devel
openssl1.1-devel = 1:1.1.1o-1.fc37
openssl1.1-devel(x86-32) = 1:1.1.1o-1.fc37
openssl1.1-devel(x86-64) = 1:1.1.1o-1.fc37
pkgconfig(libcrypto) = 1.1.1o
pkgconfig(libssl) = 1.1.1o
pkgconfig(openssl) = 1.1.1o
Both openssl devel packages provide the pkgconfig names, but with
different values, so this repoquery invocation shows too much.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
