Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 22:40:
On 26. 07. 22 15:07, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 21:28:
Dear maintainers.

Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before branching (August 
2022).

Policy: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/

The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since Fedora 35.

This report is based on dist tags.

Packages collected via:
https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ftbfs-retirements.ipynb

If you see a package that was built, please let me know.
If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, please let me 
know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for that.

If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so.

          Package                       (co)maintainers
=========================================================================
rubygem-sprockets-rails              jaruga, pvalena, ruby-packagers-sig

Depending on: rubygem-sprockets-rails (22)
     rubygem-actionmailbox (maintained by: pvalena)
         rubygem-actionmailbox-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires 
rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2

     rubygem-activestorage (maintained by: ruby-packagers-sig, vondruch)
         rubygem-activestorage-7.0.2.3-1.fc37.src requires 
rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2

     rubygem-railties (maintained by: mmorsi, pvalena, tdawson, vondruch)
         rubygem-railties-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires rubygem(sprockets-rails) 
= 3.2.2

     rubygem-sassc-rails (maintained by: pvalena)
         rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.noarch requires 
rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
         rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.src requires rubygem(sprockets-rails) 
= 3.2.2
...


Can you show what changed for rubygem-sprockets-rails compared with
the previous report one week ago?

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/BEYCREMETV6DDVFMLKOE5HR2XWEWBPFE/

The above report seems to be saying that no package depends on 
rubygem-sprockets-rails,
but this time many packages depend on rubygem-sprockets-rails.

Only 4 packages directly require rubygem(sprockets-rails):

rubygem-actionmailbox
     rubygem-actionmailbox-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src

rubygem-activestorage
     rubygem-activestorage-7.0.2.3-1.fc37.src

rubygem-railties
     rubygem-railties-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src

rubygem-sassc-rails
     rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.noarch
     rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.src


I've checked and from the spec files, it seems that they always did.

I've repoqueried this compose 
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20220719.n.0/ 
and it seems that the requirements were there.

The only difference, it seems, is that rubygem-image_processing was part of the 
FTBFS packages set before and its dep tree already included those packages, so 
the script decided not to report them twice :(

https://pagure.io/releng/blob/c9a08daa74/f/scripts/find_unblocked_orphans.py#_419

When I remove this thing, and re-add rubygem-image_processing to the list of 
FTBFS packages, I see rubygem-sprockets-rails's dependencies reported.

I guess we should fix the script, this is dangerous.

And if you think this justifies not retiring rubygem-sprockets-rails this 
round, I am OK with that.

Thanks for spotting this. No other remaining packages here seem to be affected 
by this now.


Okay, thank you for confirmation.

Anyway now I checked the upstream repo and the upstream already fixed build 
issue.
So I've backported the upstream fix and now build was successful as
rubygem-sprockets-rails-3.2.2-6.fc37 .

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2036386

Regards,
Mamoru
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to