On Thursday, August 18, 2022 4:01:39 PM CDT Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings everyone. > > Many years ago mock introduced and then made default it's isolation to > use systemd-nspawn instead of chroot. Shortly after the nspawn isolation > was added, it was used in fedoraproject koji builds, but there were > issues and since then the fedoraproject koji has defaulted to using > chroot isolation. > > Releng has had a ticket open for a long time to switch > ( https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6967 ) > > I think the two items listed there (kernel bind mounts and loop devices) > have long since been fixed, so I would like to propose we switch rawhide > to using nspawn and see if any other issues show up. > > If everyone is ok with it, I can enable it (just for rawhide) and we can > look for issues with composes or any other items. At least then we would > have a good list of things we would like to fix. If it turns out things > just work ok we can leave it enabled. > > I think moving to this will: > * More closely match developers local test mock builds. > * Provide better isolation for builds > * Help with resources as systemd-nspawn is a lot more cgroup aware than > chroot > * Allow us to close a 5 year old ticket. ;) > > Thoughts? > > kevin
Yes please! -- Robby Callicotte He/Him/His Timezone: America/Chicago IRC: c4t3l | Twitter: @robbycl2v _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
