On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 1:43 PM Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If looking at a single package in isolation it may look wasteful, but from
>> the POV of the distro as a whole packages with potential mingw sub-RPMs
>> are a small subset of what goes through koji every day.
>
>
> Perhaps, but the engineer in me finds this very distasteful :)
>
> It would probably be too much work but it would be useful to have a 
> pseudo-arch "mingw" which would just build on the first available "noarch" 
> builder.

Building noarch subpackages on multiple architectures actually
provides some benefits, even if some - or all - of the output is
thrown away:

- architecture-specific bugs that result in generation of different
"noarch" subpackages get caught (which they wouldn't be if the
"noarch" subpackage were only ever built once)
- you can run tests for the functionality that's provided by the
"noarch" subpackages on different architectures
- etc.

For example, all Rust library packages build only "noarch"
subpackages, but the packages themselves are built on *all*
architectures, because we want to know whether the shipped code
actually *compiles* and tests *succeed* on all supported
architectures. If we didn't do that, catching architecture-specific
bugs would be much harder, and would only result in random problems,
or build failures in leaf *application* packages instead of in the
package that actually has the problem.

I might remember wrong, but doing the same for Python packages was
thought about a few years ago to catch architecture-specific issues
more consistently (and not only iff the noarch python package happens
to randomly be built on the failing architecture every now and then).

Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to