On Sat, 2022-09-03 at 13:04 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 12:24:11PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > So, I have a probably-controversial idea for a follow-up on this. > > > > Even after this sweep, we have 141 proven packagers. That's a lot of > > people who can build almost anything in Fedora. > > > > It should be possible to check whether a provenpackager has built any > > package they don't have direct commit rights to in the last X months. > > > > Should we construct that search, run it, and propose removing > > provenpackager status from folks who aren't using it, to cut down that > > set? > > That policy was setup before this one for packagers. ;) > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Provenpackager_policy/
Look, I'm getting old, okay? ;) But yeah, looking at that, one 'loophole' is it doesn't check if they're actually needing *proven* packager powers - just packager powers. If a proven packager is only building packages they have explicit commit rights to, they may not need proven packager powers any more? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
