Dne 03. 09. 22 v 22:28 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 02:01:59PM +0000, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:Il 26/08/22 07:17, David Tardon ha scritto:Hi,On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 11:04 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:On to, 25 elo 2022, Miro Hrončok wrote:We use the python-maint pseudo-account to be the default Bugzilla assignee for Pythons, e.g. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.11 Note that it does *not* require the account to be listed in maintainers or to have commit rights.Same for ipa-maint account.Same for systemd-maint and dracut-maint. D.So... wouldn't be better to have a consistent way across all packages to deal with these cases?Sure, but Fedora has been around for many years, accross a bunch of differnt applications and these things have never been completly set. :(What's better, a pseudo-user to be the main-admin of a package, or a real user to be the main-admin and just add the pseudo-user as the default assignee of bugs?
What is the difference between pseudo-users and groups? The group membership management is certainly PITA, because group members cannot e.g. remove the group from retired packages:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10954Apart from that, I don't think that the pseudo-users or group ownership would work. I saw a good amount of people giving the packages to some groups or pseudo-users, but in turn, that meant there is nobody who would care about such package.
Vít
We discussed this back when we switched from pkgdb to pagure-dist-git some. One thought at the time was that we make every package use a pseutouser for main-admin, but there's downsides to that too. On the plus side it would allow us to get rid of 'main admin'.Who owns the credentials of those pseudo-users? Also, Fedora Accounts user pages links to non-existent wiki pages... it would be nice to have a description about them (if there's a consensus of continue listing them as main-admin).Many of them the group using them has the credentials, or no one at all. I'm not sure it's possible to get them all sorted, but I agree at least a wiki page with info on them would be good to have at the very least. kevin _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
