Brian C. Lane wrote:
> We have reached a point where boot security is important enough
LOL!
> that Windows is now only allowing their bootloader to be used.
It is blatantly obvious that that is actually the goal, not the means.
This is clearly a vendor lock-in "feature", with "security" used as the
excuse (just like other similar vendor lock-in "features", e.g., the iOS App
Store monopoly).
Incidentally, the "feature" not only prevents chainloading (which can be
worked around by using BootNext), but also disabling Restricted Boot
("Secure" Boot) altogether (which is a much worse restriction), because
that, too, changes the TPM PCR measurements.
But the marketing as a "security" "feature" clearly works, because there
does not seem to be any noticeable public outrage about these absolutely
unacceptable monopolistic restrictions.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
