On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 12:02 PM Michael J Gruber <m...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> While it is annoying to spell out each file it does catch package changes > which might go unnoticed otherwise. In particular, we've had a few > unannounced soname changes and such lately. [Disclaimer: I have not checked > whether the maintainer ignored the build failure for an explicit soname or > got trapped by a wildcard in these cases.] > But the packaging guidelines already mentioned not globbing the soname part of the files, so this change makes no difference to that use case. Extending the no-globbing rule to other directories like datadir seems very excessive. Why should we have to list all files a package wants to ship as its data? -Ian > > We could probably live better with wildcards if proper rpmdiff-tools were > part of the workflow and of gating or such. Those would be the right tool > for the job. > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
