On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 13:32 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 11/8/22 13:05, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 08. 11. 22 11:13, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > > > Thought I'd try to get on with the times and do the Sequoia change via > > > a PR instead of just pushing as we've traditionally done. So far so > > > good, but it throws up an error which I have no idea how to debug: > > > > > > https://artifacts.dev.testing-farm.io/700d486d-d409-44fe-b7c3-01634243558e/ > > > > > > > Unknown Error occured: An rpm exception occurred: package not > > > installed > > > > > > Okay, something failed, and it appears to be related to this very > > > change as the tests pass with a "no-op" PR. And in that case, a good > > > thing it got caught. But how on earth to debug this? I don't see > > > anything even remotely relevant in the accompanying logs, nor did I > > > find any obvious way to run this stuff locally. > > > > > > Help, Obi-Wan KenoCI. > > > > I am far from being a jeCI master, > > > > but considering the tests there were added by me, for > > pyproject-rpm-macros, I decided to have a look. > > > > The STI tests are at > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpm/blob/rawhide/f/tests/tests.yml > > > > They more or less start with: > > > > tasks: > > - dnf: > > name: "*" > > state: latest > > > > And the logs you link to say: > > > > TASK [dnf] > > ********************************************************************* > > fatal: [sut]: FAILED! => { > > "changed": false, > > "failures": [], > > "rc": 1, > > "results": [] > > } > > > > MSG: > > > > Unknown Error occured: An rpm exception occurred: package not installed > > > > This means the problem you hit is that ansible is unable to run the DNF > > task. > > Yep, that much I understood: something dnf related is failing. And that > something looks like a situation where dnf thinks a package should be > installed but isn't. > > Now, such a scenario could occur in this very context if there are > packages with SHA1 signatures involved: a previously installed package > would seem uninstalled as the header just became unaccessible due to the > bad signature. Or other similar scenarios revolving around this. But > what package is that? > > > I know how to reproduce the actual tests locally without ansible, but > > that would avoid this problem. I suggest not trying to reproduce the > > tests, but reproducing the ansible failure in isolation. My ansible > > skills are limited, I knwo how to edit the YAML, but I have no idea how > > to actually try this out. > > > > Okay, a good point - this quite obviously is *not* related to the python > %generate_requires tests, so trying to reproduce that in itself is not > useful. > > But I don't know the slightest thing about ansible, beyond a very rough > idea of what kind of tool it is. Just understanding what exactly it's > trying to do here would go a long way, I think. But either it's not in > the logs, or I don't know how to read them. > > Thanks for trying to help.
All that task means is "ensure all packages are updated". It basically means ansible will run 'dnf -y update' and expect it to succeed. There should be logs *somewhere* showing what happened when it did that. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue