On Thu Nov 24, 2022 at 12:25 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 24. 11. 22 3:38, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > > On Thu Nov 24, 2022 at 02:39 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> go-compilers > >> go-srpm-macros > > > > These should both be orphaned. go-srpm-macros has been retired, as it's > > now a subpackage of go-rpm-macros. > > But it exists on Fedora 36 and needs a maintainer there. It will likely be > auto-orphaned once Fedora 36 EOLs. Should I give it to you?
It's not part of the Fedora 36 composes, because go-rpm-macros's go-srpm-macros subpackage has a higher NEVR, but feel free to assign it to me. > > > go-compilers is Obsoleted by > > go-rpm-macros itself, but it looks like it has not yet been retired. > > I've gone ahead and done that. This split happened a few years ago, but > > the old packages were never properly removed. > > Ack. Technically also needs a maintainer but less important considering ti is > obsoleted. Users do report bugzillas for whatever component, so I do > recommend > having a responsive/responsible bugzilla PoC even for this one. You can also assign this one to me. -- Best, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
