On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 10:44 AM Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> wrote:
> I don't see anything depending on it in the RPM specs file archive.
>
> It looks like the configure script might get confused when building with
> future C compilers which do not accept implicit function declarations,
> and it's probably not worth porting this to C99.
>
According to my repoquery, erlang-js still uses mozjs68:
$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires mozjs68 --disablerepo='*'
--enablerepo=rawhide
Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora release
36 kB/s | 10 kB 00:00
Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora release
23 MB/s | 64 MB 00:02
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:13 ago on Tue 29 Nov 2022 11:18:22 AM
CET.
erlang-js-0:1.9.2-6.fc37.x86_64
mozjs68-devel-0:68.12.0-8.fc37.i686
mozjs68-devel-0:68.12.0-8.fc37.x86_64
When it is time to retire mozjs68 (apparently not yet because of erlang-js,
but hopefully soon :) ), please add mozjs68 to fedora-obsolete-packages
because a lot of users probably still have it installed and it is going to
get broken deps and break the update path as soon as icu gets updated in
rawhide.
--
Kalev
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
