On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 17:41 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 5:38 PM Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 11:34 AM Kalev Lember > > <kalevlem...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 5:26 PM Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 11:57 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > > wrote: > > >> > On 03/12/2022 00:30, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > >> > > The proposal now is to keep ImageMagick 6 and make a new > > package > > >> > > with > > >> > > ImageMagick 7 , when we have all applications use only > > ImageMagick > > >> > > 7, > > >> > > we move the sources from ImageMagick7 to ImageMagick > > >> > > > >> > I think it would be better to update the ImageMagick package > > to > > >> > version > > >> > 7 and create a compatibility package ImageMagick6. > > >> > > >> Anyone is going to review the package or not ? > > >> > > >> I already explain the situation in the other emails on this > > thread . > > >> > > >> I estimate that I will need about 200 hours to do what your > > brilliants > > >> minds ask . > > >> > > >> And btw, asking to the others to have the work that you maybe > > don't > > >> have in your packages , is very easy. if I do the compat package > > and > > >> wait for 200 packages dependency adapt to the change, will be a > > chaos , > > >> and I don't like ignore all the tickets opened around it. > > >> > > >> ImageMagick-7.0.1-10 was release on 2016-06-07, today is 2022- > > 12-03 so > > >> after 6 Years and 5 Months and 26 Days, we still haven't any > > >> ImageMagick 7 in Fedora or EL, so or you help me on do it in my > > way , > > >> or I won't do it . > > >> > > >> That is why package guidelines should be a guide and not all > > and not > > >> the all truth rule, when in practice you don't follow it just > > claim it. > > > > > > > > > I think it makes sense to do it the way Sergio is planning as it > > makes it all much much easier. I don't think we should set a too > > high bar here wrt the package naming; anything is an improvement if > > we can start getting the distro migrating to ImageMagick 7. > > > > > > We can always rename ImageMagick -> ImageMagick6 and ImageMagick7 > > -> ImageMagick at a later date when someone has the energy to do > > it. > > > > > > Don't let perfect be the enemy of good :) > > > > > > > It matters in this case because both packages provide stuff in > > /usr/bin, and we only should have one provider of those. > > ImageMagick > > should retain them, and the ImageMagick6 compat package should only > > provide libraries for stuff that can't link to the IM7 libraries. > > > > > Ah, yes, that's a good point. I think we have a bunch of packages > that 'BuildRequires: ImageMagick' and then use /usr/bin/convert > during the build to convert icons from one format to another. Other > packages require /usr/bin/convert for runtime use. > > Sergio, what's your plan for handling /usr/bin/convert?
Thank you Kalev , I don't indent change /usr/bin/convert from ImageMagick6 so probably it will /usr/bin/convert-7 Note that I checked Remi package and copied some ideas from there, so also should check how Remi handle this . > -- > Kalev > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Sérgio M. B.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
