On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 8:14 AM Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddh...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Please provide a proper "how to test" section, I cannot fix what I cannot 
> > test or compare results when I have no idea what I am seeing.
> >
> > Actually, last time I heard about number of packages, it was around 50k 
> > (not source, build result), and as I stated,
> > Ruby is missing, and so are quite a few dependent packages that should have 
> > GCC involved somewhere:
> > ~~~
> > $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires "*libruby.so*" --disablerepo="*" 
> > --enablerepo="fedora" 2>/dev/null | grep -v "i686" | uniq | wc -l
> > 115
> > ~~~
> >
> > If we also filter rubygem-* packages that depend on the *libruby.so* (and 
> > most probably contain a binary extension written in C/C++ that links to 
> > Ruby), I get 68 packages.
> > When I search "All x86_64" for "ruby" I get 28 packages. That is... not 
> > adding up.
>
> Yeah, I have missed packages; I had looked at revdeps glibc-devel,
> which turned out around 9k packages, of which 6k had any
> _FORTIFY_SOURCE use at all.  I can redo with *all* packages and
> generate a report.

I checked again and it looks like ruby had failed in that mass
rebuild[1] but I can't see the logs anymore; they've probably been
garbage collected.  I reckon it was one of those with a transient
failure that I reran by hand later.  I'm going to run a full rebuild
anyway (should take about 8 days, about 23k source packages AFAICT)
and will share the results here.

Thanks,
Sid

[1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/siddhesh/mpb.41/builds/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to