On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 09:02:36AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 06/12/2022 23:20, Michael Catanzaro via devel wrote:
> > Even if extra bounds checking makes code 10% slower, which seems very 
> > unlikely, the benefit of the extra hardening would still be worth it. 
> > _FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 is going to make it harder to hack Fedora users, 
> > converting code execution vulnerabilities into denial of service 
> > vulnerabilities.
> 
> No, it doesn't. 3% maximum is acceptable in this case.
> 
> Me and all my friends use mitigations=off. A huge performance penalty for
> the sake of potential vulnerabilities that still need to be able to exploit.

Don't assume that your insecure usage is typical of Fedora's userbase
as a whole. I doubt most people even know that mitigations=off is a
thing, nor even notice the performance penalty of the mitigations
enough to want to turn it off.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to