On 29. 01. 23 18:15, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:56 PM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com
<mailto:mhron...@redhat.com>> wrote:
If you see a package that should be exempted from the process,
please let me know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for
that.
I would like to request exemptions for:
llvm11 jistone, petersen,
sergesanspaille, tstellar
llvm12 petersen,
sergesanspaille,tstellar
which are still needed by various packages, the latter also including
ghc8.10-compiler.aarch64, ghc9.0-compiler.aarch64, ghc9.2-compiler.s390x, and
ghc9.4-compiler.s390x
Could you please open a ticket at https://pagure.io/fesco/issues
Do you happen to know why the llvm versions haven't been built/buildable since
F35?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
